home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!news
- From: Ken Garlington <GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: C/C++ crap knocks Ada
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 13:33:18 +0000
- Organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
- Message-ID: <313D941E.237E@lfwc.lockheed.com>
- References: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <1996Feb22.005518.13396@leeweyr.sccsi.com> <4gvrffINNlqo@anvil.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <SPENCER.96Feb29102241@zorgon.ERA.COM> <4h5bptINN9oi@anvil.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <4hakfl$ogd@fred.netinfo.com.au> <313C749D.2C34@lfwc.lockheed.com> <4hk3qg$24ci@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ub_998356_mtm7.lfwc.lockheed.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
-
- Peter Hermann wrote:
- >
- > A compiler vendor may be able to provide a heavy-duty-check-mode option
- > which certainly makes sense under conditions where ultra-high reliability
- > is required.
-
- Sure, individual vendors can do just about anything you want, given enough resources ;)
- But if the question is, what can you expect from the language definition, you don't
- want to oversell this feature to an extent that the argument doesn't look
- credible.
-
- Actually, I disagree that a heavy-duty-check-mode option _always_ makes sense when
- ultra-high reliability is needed, particularly if the system must fail-operate
- vs. fail-safe. That's a bit off this thread, however.
-